Neil Williams <codeh...@debian.org> writes:
> If someone comes up with good reasons to consider systemd on it's own
> merit, I'm willing to consider it. With the current approach of a
> fait-accompli "systemd is part of the GNOME dependency chain, so tough"
> then I am quite happy to dismiss systemd as an option simply because of
> this insane top-down dependency. systemd simply cannot be a viable
> choice if it has to be forced down people's throats like this.
Please reconsider this. If I wrote a little GUI calculator and made it
depend on e.g. upstart, would that also make upstart unsuitable as a
default init system because of the resulting insane top-down dependency?
Best,
Nikolaus
--
Encrypted emails preferred.
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8738nphv1x....@rath.org
