On 25.10.2013 08:23, Rene Engelhard wrote: > A NMU for a MINOR bug is NOT something which should be done. > I quietly accepted the dbs one, but this is over the line.
I can understand your rage, but to be clear: I only submitted the bug and patch, I didn't ask for it to be nmu'ed and was as surprised as you are about it - especially since I never submitted a changelog entry. > It builds fine. When some distro bogusly introduces changes which make > all kind of packages breask they can fix them up; but this is not a reason > for NMUing it in Debian. As you can see from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/away/0.9.5+ds-0+nmu1ubuntu1 I did fix it in Ubuntu. Please direct your rage at the person who took the patch, created a false changelog and uploaded it to Debian. -- Andreas Moog, Berliner Str. 29, 36205 Sontra/Germany Ubuntu Developer PGP-encrypted mails preferred (Key-ID: 74DE6624) PGP Fingerprint: 74CD D9FE 5BCB FE0D 13EE 8EEA 61F3 4426 74DE 6624
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
