+1 to xfce, but it might be worth using a nicer theme than the current xfce one.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Simon McVittie <s...@debian.org> wrote: > On 24/10/13 17:31, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> What's the the status of XFCE regarding accessibility? >> >> That was a big strengh of GNOME for a long time, though I've heard >> rumors (sorry not to be more specific) that gnome-shell has some >> unsolved issues in that regard, which is a problem since GNOME >> classic/fallback mode is gone in 3.8. > > My understanding was that it's the other way round: for Wheezy the > Debian default configuration for gdm3 (which is upstream's non-Shell > fallback mode) isn't accessible, and the recommendation is to switch it > to the GNOME-Shell-based mode used by upstream (which has more hardware > requirements, but is accessible) if required. > > Debian wheezy's "GNOME Classic" is upstream's "fallback session", with > the Panel and other GNOME-2-ish components. AIUI, upstream don't call > this mode "Classic"; that's a Debian invention. > > Upstream's "GNOME Classic" on GNOME 3.8 onwards is GNOME Shell, with > some plugins to adjust its appearance and behaviour to be somewhere > between GNOME 2 and the normal Shell. It doesn't use GNOME Panel or > other deprecated-by-upstream components, and has the same hardware > requirements as the normal Shell. > > S > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52695d11.2000...@debian.org > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CA+K2i_15d04h9jhQ3-q7JZf0gMZbsjBJg-aX-jjD62=wo8o...@mail.gmail.com
