Sorry for not setting link to [0] Here it is https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeFlashback
On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Zlatan Todoric <zlatan.todo...@gmail.com>wrote: > But then again you have Flashback mode [0]. > > And just bashing GNOME DE for systemd and GNOME Classic > is not good enough point because probably the largest user base > of Debian user use GNOME. > > This comment should not be seen as pro-GNOME as XFCE is > also decent DE which I also admire. Also I have question - the > last time I checked XFCE it had a lot of GNOME dependencies. > Is this still a true? > > Cheers, > > zlatan > > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Svante Signell > <svante.sign...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 18:31 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> >> > What's the the status of XFCE regarding accessibility? >> > >> > That was a big strengh of GNOME for a long time, though I've heard >> > rumors (sorry not to be more specific) that gnome-shell has some >> > unsolved issues in that regard, which is a problem since GNOME >> > classic/fallback mode is gone in 3.8. >> >> An even stronger reason to move away from Gnome if the classic mode >> disappears. >> >> >> >> -- >> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org >> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact >> listmas...@lists.debian.org >> Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1382632711.4928.61.ca...@s1499.it.kth.se >> >> > > > -- > Please while sending me text documents pay attention that they are by ISO > standard that is in .odt format (For sending other types of documents > please also refer to ISO/Open standars). > Its not the COST, its the VALUE! > -- Please while sending me text documents pay attention that they are by ISO standard that is in .odt format (For sending other types of documents please also refer to ISO/Open standars). Its not the COST, its the VALUE!
