On Tue, 27 Aug 2013, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, I don't think that's a very good policy. I don't see why, if the bug
> is worth fixing in a stable release for security reasons, it should go
> through the stable-updates channel instead of the security channel.
Going via stable-updates allows for more review and testing. For
non-critical issues that seems a useful thing to have.
I have used both channels for my packages in the past and was happy with
the support I received from all involved teams every time.
Cheers,
weasel
--
| .''`. ** Debian **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `- http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130828080805.gu17...@anguilla.noreply.org
