Le 27 août 2013 19:32, "Ian Jackson" <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> a écrit : > > Russ Allbery writes ("Re: Longer maintainance for (former) stable releases of Debian (Re: Dreamhost dumps Debian)"): > > If we're going to offer meaningful security support, we have to have a > > bug-fixer of last resort, and that's the party most stressed by extending > > security support. Particularly since that for every year we extend it, > > more maintainers will be uninterested in doing so for their own packages. > > This is for the the key point. In practice fairly few maintainers are > going to be willing to put in extra effort for longer support - and > particularly not in the cases where this is most difficult. > > So any proposal to do an LTS involves almost all of the extra security > effort falling on the LTS security team. That we don't have an LTS > security team composed of people willing to shoulder that burden is > the reason we don't have an LTS. Statements that "maintainers should > help out" are not encouraging. > > If it turns out that there are people who _do_ want to do that work, > with a minimum of concrete help from maintainers, then of course that > is to be encouraged. > > > Alternately, we could be far more aggressive about removing packages from > > oldstable, I suppose, but I don't think that's a good idea; that just > > leaves our users with exactly the sorts of choices that we're trying to > > avoid. I think it's much cleaner and better for our users to offer full > > security support and then retire the whole distribution at the same time. > > It makes planning considerably easier, among other things. > > Worse: in practice, removing packages is invisible to the users and > their package manager. The `removed' packages just remain, > vulnerable, on the users' systems.
Why not un this case creating an empty package depending of an non existing package ? > > Ian. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/21020.58018.931259.723...@chiark.greenend.org.uk >