On 2013-07-31 15:46:29 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 07/31/2013 08:30 AM, Steve Langasek wrote: > > What I'm missing your email is a problem statement explaining what it is > > you're trying to solve. The current implementation has been working > > reliably for years. > > He did wrote it. 127.0.1.1 breaks because some daemon (many, according > to him) bind only on 127.0.0.1, and not 127.0.0.0/8 as they should.
I disagree. If the goal is to accept connections for request to <fqdn>, then binding on 127.0.0.0/8 wouldn't be a solution, as it wouldn't work if the IP associated with <fqdn> is not a loopback one. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130731104330.ga24...@xvii.vinc17.org
