On 21 July 2013 20:22, The Wanderer <wande...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > I'm saying that it looks to me as if the lock-in to systemd would be > even stronger than the lock-in to sysvinit, and might well extend to the > point of even making it harder to implement another new alternative in > the first place.
So let's never switch to anything better than what we have now unless we also support 1 or 2 alternatives simultaneously just to be safe. /s Jeremy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAAajCMaWbUDKK1eA=h2oWqR2L0M2wv-b=cp2oz1b-f_8hmx...@mail.gmail.com
