On 2013-06-10 23:28:28 +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 04:15:27PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > This is important for apt-listbugs, which takes into account RC bugs by > > default > Which too is not ideal: for example, I don't think users should care about > such RC bugs as FTBFS or some classes of licensing problems or any other > policy violations not having any visible effects on user systems.
For FTBFS bugs, this can already be done: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=257873#41 It may be a bit more difficult to filter out other kinds of bugs without false positives. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130610224604.gb30...@xvii.vinc17.org
