Hi Ian, Le lundi, 10 juin 2013 16.11:26, Ian Jackson a écrit : > (I have CC'd cups-client@packages.)
(I'd prefer the discussion to happen on the bug.) > I'm not sure exactly what consequences you think should have flowed > from the bug's RC severity. Do you think the release should have been > delayed ? CUPS removed from wheezy ? Presumably not. So it should > have been RC-ignored for wheezy. Note that this bug doesn't impact wheezy and never has, according to the initial bugreport: "CUPS 1.5.x didn't have such a problem." We're talking about a bug in a new CUPS upstream release that landed in unstable recently. > So I agree with the main thrust of the maintainer's comments, that > this bug severity discussion is a side issue which risks distracting > us from fixing the bug. Let me remind how the "us" is currently defined by pointing at the cups RFH: #532097, any helping hand would be welcome on the cups front. -- OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201306101638.19152.o...@debian.org
