On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:31:12PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: > On 2013-06-06 12:40, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Which begs the question if build management should be merged into > dak to provide insight about which package is new. Obviously this > could also be a defined interface but if we're going to start to > reuse dak's interfaces for that... maybe not.
Well, I don't think adding more kruft to dak is a great idea (I mean, if it has to happen, it has to happen), but this really shows that we need a unified way of passing machine-readable messages between services. Let's see how the GSoC project turns out; I'm willing to bet even a proof of concept would be useful to services that interdepend so closely. I mean, not to play the "UNIX" card, but one thing well, you know? Let's just aid in the code talking to each other better. My 2ยข, anyway, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte <paul...@debian.org> : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
