On 05/23/2013 03:14 PM, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 07:16:18AM +0200, Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> Providing a conversion script which recreates all of systemd >> functionality would basically mean reimplemting a big part of >> systemd in shell. Providing an interpeter would man reimplementing >> a big part of systemd in whatever the interpreter is written in. >> Both options seem infeasible, unless only partial functionality is >> supported. [1] lists e.g. SystemCallFilter=, PrivateTmp=, PrivateNetwork=, >> CapabilityBoundingSet=, SecuritBits= which have security and >> correctness implications, and are IMHO pretty hard to recreate. > > I partly disagree here. A good reason to reimplement part of systemd is > to have a portable subset of its functionality. This could be part of > the answer to the question of what to do about kfreebsd.
If I'm not mistaking, the design you are describing is called OpenRC! :) Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51a0cdc1.1090...@debian.org
