-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

I've seen the Debconf '12 discussion on X.509 certificate stores[1]
and the Wiki page that came out of that discussion[2].

1.
http://www.irill.org/videos/debconf-12/895_X.509_Cert_Store_Discussion.mp4
2. http://wiki.debian.org/X.509

As far as I'm aware there aren't many mentions of [2] in the public
mailing lists, but I'm very interested to discuss where this is going.

My main interest is the use case for certificates from the science
grid community. The IGTF[3] has a distribution of accredited CAs that
are used world-wide to authenticate both services and users. These are
typically not the kind of CAs you'd trust for on-line banking, but
services like:

 - compute clusters
 - grid storage pools
 - science clouds
 - science workflow portals
 - etc.

3. http://www.igtf.net

The point I'd like to raise is that the current model of CA
certificates seems to take an all-or-nothing approach: either a CA is
trusted (for whatever purpose) or not. For the IGTF CAs, this may not
be the right approach.

When I started packaging the IGTF distribution for Debian[4], there
was some discussion about what the right way of doing this would be.
In the light of new(er) ideas raised in[2], it seems more thought and
discussion is still needed.

I'm offering to help out, either by contributing to the discussion,
providing tooling, testing, etc.

Thanks,

Dennis van Dok
- -- 
D.H. van Dok :: Software Engineer :: www.nikhef.nl/grid ::
Phone +31 20 592 22 28 :: http://www.nikhef.nl/~dennisvd/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Icedove - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=kqzN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/519f41bd.10...@nikhef.nl

Reply via email to