On May 12, 2013, at 2:49 PM, Wookey <woo...@wookware.org> wrote: > +++ Daniel Schepler [2013-05-12 09:19 -0700]: >> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Matthias Klose <[1]d...@debian.org> >> wrote: >> >> �- find a solution that GCC's b-d's may not be installable anymore with >> � �the current approach to binNMUs. >> >> OK, that's a good point that I hadn't thought of before.� So, it does make >> sense to keep libc6-i386 and lib32gcc1 if only for cross-architecture >> version skew issues.� But I also think for most users it would make sense >> to allow for the option of satisfying gcc-multilib's dependencies using >> multiarch,
Here's an idea: Can we keep the distribution simple enough for nearly anyone to understand? -- Mark -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2212727c-691a-444e-8242-d52237e0b...@syminet.com
