+++ Daniel Schepler [2013-05-12 09:19 -0700]: > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Matthias Klose <[1]d...@debian.org> > wrote: > > �- find a solution that GCC's b-d's may not be installable anymore with > � �the current approach to binNMUs. > > OK, that's a good point that I hadn't thought of before.� So, it does make > sense to keep libc6-i386 and lib32gcc1 if only for cross-architecture > version skew issues.� But I also think for most users it would make sense > to allow for the option of satisfying gcc-multilib's dependencies using > multiarch,
There is already some support for this in the gcc packaging runes, resulting from merging Thibaut Girka's GSOC work from last year: set with_deps_on_target_arch_pkgs=yes i.e. you build the cross-toolchain like this: DEB_TARGET_ARCH=<arch> DEB_CROSS_NO_BIARCH=yes with_deps_on_target_arch_pkgs=yes dpkg-buildpackage -d -T control DEB_TARGET_ARCH=<arch> DEB_CROSS_NO_BIARCH=yes with_deps_on_target_arch_pkgs=yes dpkg-buildpackage -b I'm not sure if that is exactly the same thing as you are talking about here? > and to make this the default option on multiarch systems.� > Though that would probably involve adding alternatives somewhere which > might be more trouble than it's worth... Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Emdebian, Wookware, Balloonboard, ARM http://wookware.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130512214942.gp2...@stoneboat.aleph1.co.uk
