On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 14:46 +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 03:04:34PM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 02:08:05PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > > > You have a point here. The problem is that people need to change their > > > operations, which is hard for many people, let alone the case when > > > emergency manuals need to be changed just for the sake of satisfying > > > Lennart. > > > > There are various benefits, discussed before at length (here, > > elsewhere). Suggesting/summarizing this as "satisfying Lennart" is a bit > > telling. > > It's still entirely accurate though. This is ultimately being driven by > uncooperative upstreams unwilling to maintain their stuff properly, and > this really means udev, and this is part of systemd for better or worse. > Well, worse.
I don't think that's fair. It's not udev itself, but the increasing number of things that may be hooked into device events. [...] > How are those udev replacement projects coming along? Something else > to think about for jessie. Apparently the eudev talk at FOSDEM was entertaining... Ben. -- Ben Hutchings For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism. - Harrison
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
