On May 10, Marc Haber <mh+debian-de...@zugschlus.de> wrote: > Having the rescue image _this_ independent is not really desireable > since one would probably have to deal with outdated or non-existing > rescue tools in the independent image while the correct software in > the correct version is on the system's own / file system. I doubt that this is going to be a problem in practice, but if it happens to be then I am sure that the grub glue package(s) can be easily enanched to keep the rescue image up to date.
> But I'll have the fsck version that is guaranteed to fit my /usr file > system in the big /usr file system, so I'll be forced to use an fsck > from a rescue image which might not be the current one, possibly > causing even more damage. People use live CDs for rescue all the time, do you have some data which show that this is actually a problem in real life and not an imaginary problem? -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
