On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 10:16:28AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 05:04 +0000, Bart Martens a écrit : > > Michael Biebl wrote : > > > The usage of really (...) that you don't have to fix all r-deps to include > > > the the epoch in the Build-Depends. > > > > Why would adding an epoch cause the need for adding the epoch in the > > build-dependent packages ? > > Because otherwise these build-dependent packages will not bring the > version they actually need? > > You know, what build-dependencies are for.
I know what build-dependencies are for, thank you. :-) The question is why epoch would need more updating of Build-Depends than with the "really" approach. I'm missing Michael Biebl's point. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130508173302.gb7...@master.debian.org
