On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 02:28:18PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 10:47:39AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > ?????????? ?????????? <pashev.i...@gmail.com> writes:
> > > Indeed. > > > So, in any case one can use its own tool just like dh: > > > %: > > > debian/megatool $@ > > Yes, from a Policy perspective. Although please consider using dh and its > > framework instead to make life easier for everyone else in the project who > > may have to help out with maintaining the package, such as the security > > team. It has a nice plugin module system that lets you add custom > > infrastructure for particular types of projects without changing the basic > > framework. > % ls -lh debian/rules > lrwxrwxrwx 1 mrvn users 1 Apr 16 12:27 debian/rules -> /usr/bin/dh I don't understand your point, other than to demonstrate that you're doing something which doesn't conform to policy? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
