On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 02:38:51PM +0300, Uoti Urpala wrote: > It is not. You can't reasonably install things from experimental rather > than unstable by default, nor is there a flag for "this really should be > in unstable if not for badly managed release"
I'm getting rather annoyed by this accusations of a "badly managed release", and the continual diatrade from yourself blaming me and the rest of the release team. > It is unreasonable to tell the users and upstreams that Debian is > going to keep users on a known inferior version by default for a long > time, just in case more testing is needed to discover problems in the > release version (often in addition to multiple already discovered > problems that Debian is intentionally leaving for users to suffer > from, as the most natural way to fix them would be to update to a > newer upstream version). > You may consider it most natural, the rest of the project values stability and not introducing untested new features. Perhaps you may feel more at home in a different distribution which aligns with your priorities more. As it happens, I'm currently canvassing a release weekend when everyone who needs to do work on the day can make it. Messages such as the above do not help in any way, shape or form. Neil -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130401120313.gm7...@halon.org.uk
