Chow Loong Jin wrote: > On 30/11/2012 10:16, Uoti Urpala wrote: > > However, current PulseAudio is still quite buggy. But I wouldn't place
> Is it, really? I haven't noticed any major issues with Pulseaudio in the past > couple of years running Ubuntu. That and sound has worked out of the box with > all the Ubuntu and Fedora systems I've installed in the past couple of months. I looked into it because there had been complaints about issues related to PulseAudio from users, and I was able to quickly find and analyze several bugs with no prior familiarity with the code. I do consider myself better than an "usual" developer, and could probably find some bugs in most projects, but I think that's still pretty strong evidence against current PulseAudio being polished code. Here's an example of one of the nastier bugs: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/pulseaudio/pulseaudio/commit/?id=29f064aa3d3a83e275361aad3f9e7efdc84b8ad0 I first sent a patch fixing that bug. A PulseAudio developer then posted an alternative approach to fixing the issue a month later. Then nothing happened for 2.5 more months until the fix was finally committed. So I think bug fixing for known bugs is not working particularly efficiently either. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1354247198.1887.117.camel@glyph.nonexistent.invalid
