On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 03:40:47AM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > We can ignore what happens to other downstreams of udev, > however I don't think that's a good idea to do so.
Why bother other downstreams if they don't complain? I find it rather intrusive to post on the lists of other downstreams, trying to convince them that a particular choice of upstream was bad. I think the proper way should be to wait until the topic actually comes up itself among the other downstreams. As I said before, even the best upstream cannot always cover every single use case and you can turn it any way you want, Gentoo is definitely a very special and uncommon use case, so I can somehow understand that upstream cannot cover that. But again, you're free to fork the code and do whatever you want. You shouldn't just run around everywhere and try to convince the other downstreams that your particular use case is the one that has to be honored. Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121129195723.gb21...@physik.fu-berlin.de
