]] Steve Langasek > On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 03:42:19PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > > The point is, systemd and udev have recently been patched by upstream so > > > that things are going *even more* on the direction of having stuff > > > stored in /usr. > > > Which is still not really a problem when tons of other daemons have > > done the same already. We're not "fixing" this by patching systemd and > > udev when many other daemons behave the same way. So, it's pointless > > anyway. > > There are no "lots of other daemons" affected by this issue. It's only the > architecture of systemd and udev that trigger this problem.
There is nothing in systemd's or udev's architecture that requires having /usr mounted early. However, it's the opinion of the systemd primary upstream authors that having /usr on a separate fs is a bad idea since there are tools that (primarily) some udev rules use, which live on /usr. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vccq6xmd....@qurzaw.varnish-software.com
