On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:29:51PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 08:17:35PM +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 07:20:02PM +0100, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote: > > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FoundationsTeam/Specs/RaringUpstartUserSessions
> > This is actually going to be very interesting to see if they are able > > to extend upstart in such a way that they can use it for session > > management similar to systemd-loginctl. > While reading a bit on it, I found this passage: > > By making use of a Linux-specific prctl(2) call, we effectively tie > > Upstart to systems running with a Linux kernel. This is a major > > restriction, but porting to other systems is already complicated by > > the fact that even the BSDs do not provide a full POSIX environment > > (missing "waitid(2)" for example). > So it's not just systemd which runs into the situation that at some > point they have to drop support for non-Linux kernels because they > need a Linux-specific feature, in this case prctl. Upstart is already not portable to non-Linux kernels. This is a known issue; had it not been for sensitivity to not breaking Debian's non-Linux ports, it's likely that upstart would have been the default in Debian before systemd was a glimmer in Lennart's eye. Unlike systemd, upstart is open to being ported to non-Linux kernels. Sadly, so far no one has stepped up to do this work. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
