Bart Martens <ba...@debian.org> wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:06:34AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: >> Why not start with a "without objection" standard and see how it >works? > >The "without objection" approach would require a reasonable delay for >people to >raise objections (some say two months). The ACK/NACK approach allows >to reach >a consensus in a shorter time, so that for obvious cases the salvaging >can >proceed without pointless delay. No. Changing 3:1 ACK/NACK to 3 (or some other number) ACKS and no objections imposes no such constraint. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/89ce141c-80d9-4e5f-b73b-2089677f2...@email.android.com
