On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 21:13 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:06:11 +0200 > Benjamin Drung <bdr...@debian.org> wrote: > > I have setup a poll for it: > > https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/Popularity_of_bzr-builddeb_and_dh-make/ > > Thanks! :) voted. > > My opinion is as BTSed, > - dh-make is still usable for 1st step. Maybe experienced/skilled developer > don't need it (but needed it at least for me ;) > > - bzr-builddeb is, well, it seems that is useful in UDD (Ubuntu Distributed > Development, as Ubuntu packaging guide says) way, but now it heavily > relies on Launchpad in my point of view. And, packaging-dev can specify > vendor-specific Recommends/Suggest in its rules, then use it for Ubuntu > is meaningful. > > (Well, LP is quite nice and Debian should consider to introduce its good > point (user friendly web interface, etc), but I don't want to depend on > it, sorry). bzr-builddeb is perfectly well usable without Launchpad; it doesn't depend on it. I've been using it with bzr.debian.org for a long time.
There are two commands that have some Launchpad-specific integration, but that integration is completely optional and those commands are still perfectly usable without Launchpad. There is also no hard dependency on python-launchpadlib. Cheers, Jelmer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1350044879.7083.18.camel@gwenhwyvar
