Hi,
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 12:06:11 +0200
Benjamin Drung <bdr...@debian.org> wrote:
> I have setup a poll for it:
> https://dudle.inf.tu-dresden.de/Popularity_of_bzr-builddeb_and_dh-make/
Thanks! :) voted.
My opinion is as BTSed,
- dh-make is still usable for 1st step. Maybe experienced/skilled developer
don't need it (but needed it at least for me ;)
- bzr-builddeb is, well, it seems that is useful in UDD (Ubuntu Distributed
Development, as Ubuntu packaging guide says) way, but now it heavily
relies on Launchpad in my point of view. And, packaging-dev can specify
vendor-specific Recommends/Suggest in its rules, then use it for Ubuntu
is meaningful.
(Well, LP is quite nice and Debian should consider to introduce its good
point (user friendly web interface, etc), but I don't want to depend on
it, sorry).
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20121012211342.4c62fb639fdcf095a73d6...@debian.or.jp
