On Thursday, October 11, 2012 06:44:53 PM Charles Plessy wrote: ... > - I am not found of the voting procedure, and would rather propose to > follow a similar process as for the modification of the Policy and the > Developers Reference, where at least three DDs need to indicate that, in > their conclusion, a consensus has been reached. I think that if a package > is orphaned with for instance a 16:3 majority, it indicates a problem > rather than a consensus. Also if the maintainer opposes, this shows lack > of consensus and a vote can only aggravate the situation. ...
I am also concerned with this. I think it should either be unanimous or there is a dispute the tech ctte should resolve. I don't think we should introduce voting on the quality of other DD's package maintenance. Scott K -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/7338961.iqtWnx2jL2@scott-latitude-e6320
