I happened to copy the libc5 badblocks binaries onto my libc6
system, for a project I'm working on, and for curiousity's sake,
ran ldd on it;
[10:12am] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:DLX.lilo/rd-tree/bin# ldd ./badblocks
libext2fs.so.2 => /lib/libext2fs.so.2 (0x4000b000)
libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x4001b000)
libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x4001d000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x400d9000)
ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40178000)
Two versions of libc? Looking at the individual libraries,
[10:12am] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:DLX.lilo/rd-tree/bin# ldd /lib/libext2fs.so.2
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40013000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x2aaaa000)
libcom_err.so.2 => /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x400b2000)
[10:19am] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:DLX.lilo/rd-tree/bin# ldd /lib/libcom_err.so.2
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40005000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x2aaaa000)
Is this a bug in something?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
