On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 10:36:51AM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > Le mardi, 24 juillet 2012 09.03:30, Philipp Kern a écrit : > > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:31:43PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > > > Please try using complete sentences. While you're at it, > > > constructive messages would be more productive than name-calling. > > If you think that your messages are constructive, well, you're wrong. > > You're repeating the same arguments over and over again, despite not being > > a Debian Developer (yes, this time with two captial letters) and being > > told to stop. > FWIW, although I agree with the uselessness of repeating arguments over and > over, we should still be very careful about the use of the "You are no Debian > Developer so you can't speak" argument: we have seen both useless and noisy > contributions from DDs and useful and constructive contributions from non-DDs.
Sure. I was refering to Steve's point about d-d-a being a list primarily
targetted at DDs and a must-subscribe for DDs. I just don't feel that some
non-DD
can stand up and continue to demand changes that vocally if he's only a
circumstantial part of the audience. Especially given the fact that there was
no support for this cause from the target audience of the list.
And then he claimed to be a Debian developer[1] which is untrue given the
intended meaning DD.
Everybody can speak here as long as he contributes something useful[2].
> The DD status doesn't grant any right to behave as a troll; I tend to think
> it
> rather imposes the contrary.
Sure. I sort of realized that after sending my message that I should've said
that. Full ACK. :)
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
[1] The funny bit being that even the list page says "Debian developer" for
the people whose messages are accepted.
[2] Or funny, but that may be -curiosa material.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
