On Sat, 2012-06-16 at 20:40:03 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 07:58:03PM +0900, Osamu Aoki a écrit : > > > > We can think of 3 candidate files. > > #1, debian/copyright > > #2, debian/watch > > #3, debian/control (Not for me but you suggested) > > I would like to add debian/upstream to the list. It is machine-readable, > documented, gathered, and later this year I think I will more formally > propose it as a DEP. > > See http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2012/06/msg00505.html for a > longer agumentation. > > Please do not hesitate to tell me of any objections you have for this file, > so that we can attempt to work them out.
I've mentioned this before, to me the fact that it's using yaml instead of rfc2822-like syntax (the standard for Debian package metadata) is a problem, it means we need to use yet another different parser. thanks, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120616132733.ga18...@gaara.hadrons.org
