On 20.04.2012 16:55, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Matthias Klose writes ("Bug#664257: multiarch tuples are not
> documented/defined"):
>> On 18.04.2012 05:16, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>> I think the Multiarch/Tuples wiki page is now in a sane state, though
>>> as always it could presumably be improved even more. I think future
>>> required improvements can be tracked separately. Do you mind if this
>>> bug is closed?
>>
>> lowered the severity. IMO it should stay open until multiarch is incorporated
>> into the FHS and/or the LSB.
>
> We do not normally keep a bug open in the Debian BTS that cannot be
> fixed in Debian.
>
> What change to the Debian operating system, or to processes,
> documents, infrastructure or organisational arrangements, maintained
> by the Debian project, is this bug requesting ?
I won't fight for this. But it's some kind of Debian responsibility to
address/forward these. Just filing this with the FHS and/or LSB is likely
getting ignored. If you have better ways to track progress with this issue,
please tell here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f917b0a.6010...@debian.org
