On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:23:21PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > And the third advantage of it, is that upstream people is starting to > > > > ship > > > > systemd unit files. > > > It is not advantage. it is crap. I believe no one can write and support > > > init/systemd/whatsoever scripts sutable for many distributions and their > > > versions. > > That's right, nobody can write initscripts for all distros because they > > are incompatible. Isn't this problem solved by systemd? > > No, it was mentioned previously that systemd does not aim at being a > (linux distro) standard. Is being a (linux distro) standard the same as being the default /sbin/init in all distros? If yes, I don't see how is it relevant here. What I meant is: it is a common knowledge that you need to write an initscript for each specific distro even though most of them use sysvinit, but does this apply to systemd unit files too?
-- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
