]] Samuel Thibault > > The maintenance of systemd is actually quite the opposite of a standard. > > That sentence is quite frightening.
Is it? It's not like the maintenance of the kernel, KDE or GNOME is done in the manner you maintain a standard. Heck, probably just about no software in Debian is maintained in a manner that would be suitable for a standard. > > It's focused on being clean, supportable, and fully integrated with > > Linux capabilities, *not* to solving everyone's use case, even to > > the detriment of being universal. > > So that directly conflicts with making it a default init > implementation. For Linux? Not particularly. For non-Linux ports? Sure. Nobody has seriously argued against that. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871uoa2om0....@qurzaw.varnish-software.com
