On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 06:59:52PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote: > On Friday, March 23, 2012 18:26:37, Michael Biebl wrote: > > On 23.03.2012 20:07, Chris Knadle wrote: > > > Right now the situation may be somewhat reversed, because in the general > > > case, daemons need to be patched to work correctly with systemd. > > > > This is simply not true. > > > > Only if you want to use socket activation, you need to patch your > > daemon. But socket activation support is entirely optional. > > Lennart Pottering during his talk said that daemons needed to be patched to > fully work with systemd,
Where "fully work" implies socket activation, AIUI. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120323232310.gl23...@nighthawk.chemicalconnection.dyndns.org
