On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 11:30:21, Andres Mejia wrote: > On Mar 21, 2012 10:57 AM, "Svante Signell" <svante.sign...@telia.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 14:44 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > > ]] Svante Signell > > > > > > > Regarding who is expert or not, can the people who considers > > themselves > > > > > as such (others shouldn't bother) do a _scientific_ comparison of the > > > > three alternatives with respect to important features. First step > > would > > > > > be to write down which aspects are important, and continue from > > > > there. Also, practical experiments are needed to verify statements > > > > made. > > > > > > I'd rather work on making systemd better and a better init system for > > > Debian than to satisfy some academic desire for a comparison of init > > > systems. > > > > How on earth would anybody be able to make a decision if there are no > > comparisons between the alternatives available?
... > FYI, some level of analysis between the three init systems has been done. > See [1]. > > 1. http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/why.html > > A bit of a disclaimer here, this comparison was done by a systemd > developer. OTOH he makes quite a convincing argument for systemd. > > ~ Andres There's an hour-long talk [1] the same guy gave at LinuxConf in Australia last March, which I found informative. This is linked to from [2], where there is also a link to a PDF of the slides. [1] https://blip.tv/linuxconfau/beyond-init-systemd-4715015 [2] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd -- Chris -- Chris Knadle chris.kna...@coredump.us -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201203230014.16807.chris.kna...@coredump.us
