]] Svante Signell > On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 14:44 +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > ]] Svante Signell > > > > Regarding who is expert or not, can the people who considers themselves > > > as such (others shouldn't bother) do a _scientific_ comparison of the > > > three alternatives with respect to important features. First step would > > > be to write down which aspects are important, and continue from there. > > > Also, practical experiments are needed to verify statements made. > > > > I'd rather work on making systemd better and a better init system for > > Debian than to satisfy some academic desire for a comparison of init > > systems. > > How on earth would anybody be able to make a decision if there are no > comparisons between the alternatives available?
It could be as simple as «the most popular/the one which people actually ship units/jobs for is the one we'll move to». > [...] This could be a useful GSoC task. Given there's no code to write in such a report, I don't think it'd be appropriate for gsoc. > This would be much more intersting than writing a > systemd-to-initscript converter. This I disagree with, Debian doesn't work by people sitting down, writing papers and then agreeing on a course of action. Debian works, mostly, by people putting in effort and then documenting how others can solve the same or similar problems. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87iphx8s9x....@qurzaw.varnish-software.com
