OoO Pendant le repas du dimanche 11 mars 2012, vers 19:24, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-...@web.de> disait :
>> Yes, but systemd relies on cgroups which are not portable. If all >> daemons were able to not fork, it would be easier to convert a .service >> file to a classic init.d script and therefore use systemd (for example) >> as default with Linux and sysvinit with autogenerated files on kFreeBSD. > That would actually make things more difficult since then you have to > add some delay into the sysvinit files to wait for the daemon to become > ready before the init.d script returns. Is start-stop-daemon actually relying on the PID file being created to know if the daemon is ready? Or maybe you mean a daemon fork only when it is ready? > The only thing that would benefit would be to run systemd on kFreeBSD > without the cgroup mechanism. No forking so no need to trace fork()s. It seems that systemd relies on many more Linux specifics. -- Vincent Bernat ☯ http://vincent.bernat.im /* Fuck me gently with a chainsaw... */ 2.0.38 /usr/src/linux/arch/sparc/kernel/ptrace.c
pgpugEaapTN2r.pgp
Description: PGP signature
