On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 10:23:33AM +0900, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Di, 06 Mär 2012, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > the Blends framework. I would most probably drop some file
> > >
> > > /etc/apt/preferences.d/01-disable-dmo.pref
> > >
> > > in multimedia-config metapackage (where all other metapackages usually
>
> And I would file a serious bug against that. There is no reasoning
> behind that is in any way reasonable.
>
> Only because these are providing similar packages starting
> a "hunting down the enemies" race is irrational, or even worse,
> simply stupid.
In how far is it stupid that if a metapackage intends to install a set
of _Debian_ packages featuring multimedia tasks to make sure that really
these packages are installed while enabling a user to install, say
acrobat reader in addition without influencing the set of multimedia
packages available inside Debian? It is not about hunting down anything
but installing reasonable preconfiguration - local admin can override
this for sure.
I wonder what criterion of serios bug would apply here. Just for the
sake of interest because I do not intend to implement this personally.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120306091502.gb26...@an3as.eu
