On 12-03-05 at 11:04pm, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 04:42:50PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > > In summary, I can only advise everyone against enabling that > > repository on any machine. > > If I would have time to become a pkg-multimedia member I would try to > establish installing multimedia applications via metapackages build be > the Blends framework. I would most probably drop some file > > /etc/apt/preferences.d/01-disable-dmo.pref > > in multimedia-config metapackage (where all other metapackages usually > depend from). This would enable those users who really know what they > are doing picking singular packages via well defined preferences from > d.m.o if needed and prevent users who blindly inject "random sources" > inside their sources.list from killing their system.
Please let us stop this deroute. Yes, d-m.o is problematic, but so is potentially *any* package cocktail involving unofficial packages. Heck, even involving only official packages but across well-tested-together repositories. Let's not turn this into a witch hunt. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
