On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Reinhard Tartler <siret...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Milan P. Stanic <m...@arvanta.net> wrote: >> For me d-m.o was (and still is) valuable resource. >> Some codecs missing in Debian packages because of the policy (I don't >> blame Debian for that) and in that case d-m.o is best option for me >> because I don't want/have time to package it from the source. > > Out of curiousity, what codecs do you miss in the official debian packages?
libdvdcss2 This may have been mentioned elsewhere in this thread, but a wiki page under wiki.debian.org instructs users to use d-m.o as a repository to get various codecs. http://wiki.debian.org/MultimediaCodecs Obviously wikis need to be taken with a grain of salt, but anything (including wiki.d.o) under the debian.org domain feels somewhat official and can lead users without the requisite knowledge to heed said advice. If there are users out there who can distill their knowledge regarding codecs and improve the wiki page, then that would be much appreciated. Thanks! -matt zagrabelny -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caolfk3xqxeg-zjzcekbmo3mbto-9cqyscpmuevzfkq-rwza...@mail.gmail.com
