On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 16:45, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Milan P. Stanic <m...@arvanta.net> wrote: > > For me d-m.o was (and still is) valuable resource. > > Some codecs missing in Debian packages because of the policy (I don't > > blame Debian for that) and in that case d-m.o is best option for me > > because I don't want/have time to package it from the source. > Out of curiousity, what codecs do you miss in the official debian packages?
It was a long ago when I installed packages from d-m.o so I can't remember right now. I just put (in apt.sources): deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org testing main contrib deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org unstable main contrib and forgot about it. When I encounter conflict in apt/itude I know how to resolve it or just don't care if it isn't important. So, I appreciate Christian Marrilat effort with d-m.o when Debian was not unable to package all codecs and apps due to patent and licencing 'issues'. Again, I don't blame Debian for that. I just want to tell that the d-m.o was and I think it would be useful just because Debian cannot ship all software/codecs which have patent/licence problem. -- Kind regards, Milan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120305170115.ga29...@arvanta.net
