Josselin Mouette <j...@debian.org> writes:

> This feature was in squeeze and so far we didn’t reinstate it in 3.x on
> upstream request. This is because they complained people used this
> feature to shoot themselves in the foot and then accused gdm of being
> broken. 

So they choose to break gdm and ignore all those now *rightfully*
accusing gdm of being broken?

That makes no sense at all.

I'm not going to call it crazy.  It's merely insane.


Bjørn


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87sjhvdrew....@nemi.mork.no

Reply via email to