OoO En cette fin de nuit blanche du jeudi 23 février 2012, vers 06:47, Miles Bader <mi...@gnu.org> disait :
>> We should not still be using this software. > Er, given that gdm3 works fine for many people, that seems excessive. > Moreover, the choice of default display manager seems unrelated to its > ability to support obscure tweaks -- indeed, it's very common for > default packages to be those that are nicer for "average" users, not > those that are the most customizable. You have the choice of easily > installing other display managers that meet your criteria, so what's > the big deal? Moreover, other display manager may not work correctly because gdm3 is the only display manager supporting all modern stuff. For example, we could switch to something like "slim" but slim does not play nice with ConsoleKit which means that a user logged with slim won't be considered as a local user and therefore won't have rights for power management, network configuration and things like that. See: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=601003 The main problem is things are now more complex than 10 years ago and alternatives are unable to cope with all the new things necessary to make a desktop work correctly. We have to rely on parts of the GNOME desktop. Unfortunately, those parts are dependant on other parts and are not as hackable and documented as we are used to. -- Vincent Bernat ☯ http://vincent.bernat.im Make input easy to proofread. - The Elements of Programming Style (Kernighan & Plauger)
pgpx3YUqDEo0k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
