Josselin Mouette <j...@debian.org> writes:
> Le vendredi 24 février 2012 à 10:45 +0000, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
>> Should we allow kFreeBSD and Hurd (and, possibly, other kernels in
>> the future), which do not support the features required by systemd
>> and upstart, allow us to get away from sysvinit and start using an
>> event based init system?
>>
>> * If we stick to sysvinit, we lose the benefits of event based init.
>> * If we support sysvinit and at least one of upstart and systemd,
>> we make a bunch of extra work for every package that needs init
>> integration.
>> * If we support only systemd or upstart, then we effectively lose
>> non-Linux kernels.
>
> There is another option here.
> We make a project-wide decision of which init system to use for Linux
> (systemd or upstart). And we write a compatibility layer for non-Linux
> systems, that generates sysvinit-compatible scripts based on systemd
> services or upstart jobs.
If we support sysvinit-compatible scripts for non-Linux systems then
there is really no reason for not supporting them on Linux too.
So what you are saying is:
Lets support more than one init system.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871upk2p1v.fsf@frosties.localnet
