On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 17:07:46 +0800 Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote:
> On 02/23/2012 05:54 PM, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:29:37AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote: > > > >> I know the System V init system fairly well but I am new to both > >> Upstart and systemd. Obviously the two are similar insofar as they > >> are both able to supersede SysV init. > >> > > I'm mostly a newbie with both, too. However, apart from technical > > differences, I see the following as a serious issue: upstart > > requires contributors to sign the Canonical contributor agreement > > (http://www.canonical.com/contributors). That requirement would > > prevent at least some people (including myself) from being > > interested in working on upstart at all, unless paid. > > > > > Gosh, this is insane. I agree it would be a blocker. We can't ask > all the maintainers of providing daemon packages to sign it, and > there's no reasons why we should force them to. Contributors *to upstart* need to agree to the canonical contribution agreement, I'm not sure what gives you the idea that all daemon maintainers will fall in that category. thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK7FOSS) http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
