Le Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 04:49:33PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf a écrit : > > There is a > big difference between all of the changelog concerning you being: > > * Team upload. > > to it being > > * Team upload. > * Fixed libquack linking with moox, depends: updated (Closes: #654321) > > For the first case, if you are part of the team (and Carlos is as > well), just sponsor it and go on. But if you find something (trivial > or not) to fix on the package, being part of the team should mean you > don't have to list yourself in debian/control, and can just > acknowledge it by mentioning "Team upload" in the changelog.
Here is the full diff: --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ -r-cran-proto (0.3-9.2-1) UNRELEASE; urgency=low +r-cran-proto (0.3-9.2-1) unstable; urgency=low + * Team upload. + + [ Carlos Borroto ] * Initial release (Closes: #657994) - -- Carlos Borroto <carlos.borr...@gmail.com> Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:34:31 -0500 + -- Charles Plessy <ple...@debian.org> Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:47:24 +0900 We prefer that packages that are not uploaded have "UNRELEASED" as distribution name. So I had to set it to unstable when I uploaded (and committed a tag, and commtited the build logs in the repository). Doing this I could have either kept the changelog signature of Carlos with the old date, which would be inaccurate, or change the date, but I do not feel changing the date on somebody elses signature. I think that team uploads are more natural than sponsoring when maintaining a source package in a team's VCS. Have a nice day, -- Charles -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120221234724.ga1...@falafel.plessy.net
