On 2012-02-20, Christoph Anton Mitterer <cales...@scientia.net> wrote: > 2) Well I really feel bad now, having to point my finger at the Nagios > Maintainers as they really do a good job, but this just shocked me: > Bug #660585. > > Well as I describe in the bug, it is practically (at the moment) of no > relevance as SSL in Nagios' NRPE is broken. > The problem here is IMHO rather the attitude behind.
Well, the rationale is documented in #333552 (which is linked to by the changelog). AIUI it doesn't matter because it's just about randomizing unused parts of the packet. Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnjk466h.1o2.tr...@kelgar.0x539.de
