On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 02:54:43PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 03:45:50AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >> While this could benefit the multiarch installations (for which they
> >> can easily use --path-exclude), it would use lots more space on single
> >> arch installations.
> >
> > Does it really?
> >
> > A quick test tells me that uncompressing every file under /usr/share/doc
> > does indeed increase the size of that directory on my laptop by a factor
> > of approximately two:
> >
> > After running "sudo find /usr/share/doc -name '*.gz' -exec gunzip {} \;",
> > the size of that directory is as reported by 'du -s' is 1263220
> > kibibytes, while it was 757280 before, a difference of 505940.
> >
> > This is on a system with 2524 packages installed, for a grand total
> > of...
> >
> > dpkg-query -W -f '${Installed-Size}\n' | awk '{TOT+=$0} END{print TOT}'
> > 8830371
> >
> > ... approximately 8.5GiB of installed software. While I agree that
> > adding around 500MiB to that installed size is significant, I wouldn't
> > define it as 'lots more space'. Additionally, it should be possible for
> > dpkg to support compressing at install time for those users who request
> > it, based on a configuration parameter.
>
> Note that only a fraction of that would be in MA:same packages.
> Everything else can stay compressed. Some other test (see other mails in
> thread) estimated an increase of 60MB.
Yes, but I think that's a bad idea. Either we should compress
everything, or nothing at all. Compressing some files but not others is
going to be confusing, inconsistent, and generally a bad idea.
--
The volume of a pizza of thickness a and radius z can be described by
the following formula:
pi zz a
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120210063939.go3...@grep.be
