Tanguy Ortolo <tanguy+deb...@ortolo.eu> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow, 2012-02-09 15:02+0100: >> Again I don't see how the situation would be different with depends >> instead of breaks. In both cases it is impossible to install a >> mismatching set of versions. > > Well, with > Package: xul-ext-adblock-plus > Depends: iceweasel (>= 3.6.13, << 12.0~a1+) | iceape (>= 2.1, << 2.9~a1+) > you could install xul-ext-adblock-plus as long as you have a compatible > version of iceweasel, even if you have an incompatible version of > iceape. > > With the current implementation > Package: xul-ext-adblock-plus > Depends: iceweasel (>= 3.6.13) | iceape (>= 2.1) > Breaks: iceweasel (>= 12.0~a1+), iceweasel (<< 3.6.13), > iceape (>= 2.9~a1+), iceape (<< 2.1) > you cannot install xul-ext-adblock-plus if you have an incompatible > version of iceape, even if you have a compatible version of iceweasel. > Which is wrong.
True, there is a small difference there. Thanks for explaining. Unless it truely breaks (e.g. segfaults) iceweasel or iceape the depends would then be better. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87vcngngml.fsf@frosties.localnet